{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Century Law Firm Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog","author_name":"admin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/author\/admin\/","title":"Arbitration Latest Supreme Court Judgement - 9310411779","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fKHwgLdjXS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/arbitration-latest-supreme-court-judgement\/\">Arbitration Latest Supreme Court Judgement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/arbitration-latest-supreme-court-judgement\/embed\/#?secret=fKHwgLdjXS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Arbitration Latest Supreme Court Judgement&#8221; &#8212; Century Law Firm Blog\" data-secret=\"fKHwgLdjXS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Supreme Court of India in Perkins Eastman Architects DPC &amp; Anr Versus HSCC (India) Ltd., ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2019, has held that the person who has interest in the outcome of the decision of the dispute must not have the power to appoint a Sole Arbitrator. Court looked into a number of judgements [&hellip;]"}