{"id":2476,"date":"2023-08-07T14:08:11","date_gmt":"2023-08-07T08:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/?p=2476"},"modified":"2026-10-20T06:07:18","modified_gmt":"2026-10-20T00:37:18","slug":"article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: The Six Freedoms, Reasonable Restrictions, What Happened to Article 19(1)(f), and Landmark Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees to every citizen six freedoms: speech and expression, peaceful assembly, association, movement, residence, and the freedom to practise a profession or carry on a trade or business. None of them is absolute. Each is subject to one of clauses (2) to (6), which allow the State to make laws imposing &#8220;reasonable restrictions&#8221; on specified grounds only; movement and residence share clause (5). A seventh freedom, the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property in Article 19(1)(f), was removed from the Constitution with effect from 20 June 1979, and property is now protected by Article 300A. This guide sets out the current text from the official Legislative Department edition, explains each freedom and its matching restriction clause, summarises the Supreme Court&#8217;s leading judgments from Romesh Thappar (1950) to 2025, and covers emergencies, remedies, a Hindi summary and common questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"clf-keyfacts\" style=\"border:1px solid #d9d2c5;background:#faf7f2;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 18px;margin:0 0 24px\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:700\">Article 19 at a glance<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:20px\">\n<li><strong>Heading:<\/strong> &#8220;Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.&#8221; It is in Part III (Fundamental Rights), under the sub-heading &#8220;Right to Freedom&#8221;.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Who has the rights:<\/strong> &#8220;All citizens&#8221;. A corporation is not a citizen and cannot itself enforce Article 19, though shareholders&#8217; rights can be protected (R.C. Cooper, 1970).<\/li>\n<li><strong>The six freedoms today:<\/strong> 19(1)(a) speech and expression; (b) assembly; (c) associations, unions or co-operative societies; (d) movement; (e) residence; (g) profession, occupation, trade or business.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Restrictions:<\/strong> only by law, only &#8220;reasonable&#8221;, and only on the grounds named in clauses (2) to (6). The grounds in clause (2) are exhaustive (Kaushal Kishor, 2023).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 19(1)(f):<\/strong> the right &#8220;to acquire, hold and dispose of property&#8221; was omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 with effect from 20 June 1979. Article 300A now says no person shall be deprived of property save by authority of law.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Emergency:<\/strong> under Article 358, while a Proclamation of Emergency on the ground of war or external aggression is in operation, Article 19 does not restrict laws that recite that they relate to the Emergency, or action taken under them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Reviewed and updated by Century Law Firm, Delhi \u2013 October 2026. Statutory references are to the Acts as in force on that date.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The text of Article 19<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Clause (1), as it stands in the official text, reads: &#8220;All citizens shall have the right\u2014 (a) to freedom of speech and expression; (b) to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) to form associations or unions or co-operative societies; (d) to move freely throughout the territory of India; (e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and (f) * * * (g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Clause (2), which governs speech, reads: &#8220;Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Clauses (3) to (6) follow the same pattern for the other freedoms. Clause (3) allows reasonable restrictions on the right of assembly &#8220;in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order&#8221;. Clause (4) allows them on the right to form associations &#8220;in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order or morality&#8221;. Clause (5) allows reasonable restrictions on the rights of movement and residence &#8220;either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe&#8221;. Clause (6) allows them on the right to a profession, occupation, trade or business &#8220;in the interests of the general public&#8221;, and adds that nothing in sub-clause (g) prevents laws relating to &#8220;the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business&#8221;, or to the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, &#8220;whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The footnotes in the official edition record how the article reached this form. Clause (2) was substituted by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951, with retrospective effect, and the closing words of clause (6), on professional qualifications and State trading, were substituted by the same Amendment with effect from 18 June 1951. The words &#8220;the sovereignty and integrity of India&#8221; were inserted in clauses (2), (3) and (4) by the Constitution (Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, with effect from 5 October 1963. The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 omitted sub-clause (f) and changed clause (5) from &#8220;sub-clauses (d), (e) and (f)&#8221; to &#8220;sub-clauses (d) and (e)&#8221;, both with effect from 20 June 1979. The words &#8220;or co-operative societies&#8221; in sub-clause (c) were inserted by the Constitution (Ninety-seventh Amendment) Act, 2011.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"clf-figure clf-ig\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px;padding:14px 12px;border:1px solid #e3e3e3;border-radius:6px;background:#fff\">\n<style>.entry-content .clf-ig,.entry-content .clf-ig *{box-sizing:border-box}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-title{display:block;font-weight:700;color:#1f2d3d;font-size:1em;line-height:1.35;margin:0 0 4px;text-align:center}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-sub{display:block;font-size:.82em;line-height:1.4;color:#555;margin:0 0 12px;text-align:center}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(160px,1fr));gap:10px;margin:0 0 10px}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-grid2{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(240px,1fr));gap:10px;margin:0 0 10px}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-grid3{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(200px,1fr));gap:10px;margin:0 0 10px}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-box{background:#faf7f2;border:1.5px solid #b9a98c;border-radius:8px;padding:10px 12px;font-size:.88em;line-height:1.45;color:#222;overflow-wrap:anywhere;margin:0}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-h{display:block;font-weight:700;color:#1f2d3d;margin:0 0 3px;font-size:1.02em}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-s{display:block;color:#6b5f4b;font-size:.86em;margin:4px 0 0}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-red{background:#fdeeee;border-color:#c98585}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-green{background:#eef6ee;border-color:#86a986}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-dark{background:#1f2d3d;border-color:#1f2d3d;color:#fff;text-align:center}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-dark .ig-h{color:#fff;font-size:1.15em}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-arrow{display:block;text-align:center;color:#8a7a5c;font-size:1.3em;line-height:1;margin:0 0 10px}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-label{display:block;text-align:center;font-weight:700;color:#1f2d3d;font-size:.9em;margin:0 0 6px}.entry-content .clf-ig ul.ig-list{margin:0;padding:0 0 0 1.1em;list-style:disc}.entry-content .clf-ig ul.ig-list li{margin:0 0 4px;padding:0;font-size:inherit;line-height:1.45}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-note{display:block;font-size:.8em;line-height:1.4;color:#555;margin:4px 0 0}.entry-content .clf-ig .ig-cap{margin:10px 0 0;font-size:13px;color:#555}<\/style>\n<span class=\"ig-title\">Article 19: each freedom and the grounds on which it can be restricted<\/span>\n<span class=\"ig-sub\">Constitution of India, Article 19(1) to (6), official text as in force in October 2026<\/span>\n<div class=\"ig-grid3\">\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(a) Speech and expression<\/span>Clause (2): sovereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, incitement to an offence.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(b) Assemble peaceably and without arms<\/span>Clause (3): sovereignty and integrity of India, public order.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(c) Associations, unions, co-operative societies<\/span>Clause (4): sovereignty and integrity of India, public order, morality.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(d) Move freely throughout India<\/span>Clause (5): interests of the general public, protection of any Scheduled Tribe.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(e) Reside and settle anywhere in India<\/span>Clause (5): interests of the general public, protection of any Scheduled Tribe.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(g) Profession, occupation, trade or business<\/span>Clause (6): interests of the general public; laws on professional or technical qualifications; State trading, even to the exclusion of citizens.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ig-box ig-red\"><span class=\"ig-h\">19(1)(f) Acquire, hold and dispose of property \u2013 omitted<\/span>Removed by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 with effect from 20 June 1979. Property is now protected by Article 300A: &#8220;No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.&#8221;<\/div>\n<p class=\"ig-cap\" style=\"margin:10px 0 0;font-size:13px;color:#555\">Prepared by Century Law Firm from the Legislative Department&#8217;s official text of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who can claim the rights under Article 19<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unlike Article 14, which speaks of &#8220;any person&#8221;, and Article 21, which says &#8220;No person shall be deprived&#8221;, Article 19 begins with the words &#8220;All citizens&#8221;. A company or a statutory corporation is not a citizen. In Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India (10 February 1970), decided by eleven judges in a challenge to the transfer of the undertakings of named banks, the Court recalled that in the State Trading Corporation case it had held that &#8220;the Corporation not being a citizen was incompetent to enforce the rights guaranteed by Art. 19&#8221;. The same judgment, however, held that the Court&#8217;s jurisdiction &#8220;cannot be denied, when by State action \u2026 the rights of the individual shareholder are impaired, if that action impairs the rights of the Company as well&#8221;, and that the test of whether a shareholder&#8217;s right is impaired &#8220;is not formal: it is essentially qualitative&#8221;. Shareholders who are citizens can therefore challenge State action that impairs their rights through their company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each restriction clause saves an existing law, or a law that the State makes, imposing reasonable restrictions on the grounds it names (clause (6) also saves laws on qualifications and State trading). It is that law which a court tests for reasonableness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19(1)(a): freedom of speech and expression<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first case on the clause set its tone. In Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950), an order made under section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 had banned the entry and circulation of a weekly journal called &#8220;Cross Roads&#8221;. The Supreme Court, by a majority with Justice Fazl Ali dissenting, held that freedom of speech and expression includes freedom of propagation of ideas, which &#8220;is ensured by the freedom of circulation&#8221;, and that section 9(1-A) was &#8220;wholly unconstitutional and void&#8221;. As quoted in Kaushal Kishor (2023), the Court said that &#8220;unless a law restricting freedom of speech and expression is directed solely against the undermining of the security of the State or the overthrow of it, such law cannot fall within the reservation under clause (2) of Art. 19&#8221;. Kaushal Kishor records that Parliament then &#8220;sought to amend the Constitution through the Constitution (First Amendment) Bill, 1951&#8221;; the First Amendment substituted clause (2) with retrospective effect, and the Sixteenth Amendment of 1963 added the sovereignty and integrity of India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Freedom of the press is not mentioned separately in Article 19, but the Supreme Court has read it into clause (1)(a). In Sakal Papers ([1962] 3 SCR 842), which concerned the Daily Newspaper (Price and Page) Order, 1960, a Constitution Bench described &#8220;freedom of speech and expression of opinion&#8221; as being &#8220;of paramount importance under a democratic constitution&#8221;, and said: &#8220;It cannot, like the freedom to carry on business, be curtailed in the interest of the general public.&#8221; In Bennett Coleman ([1973] 2 SCR 757), Justice Beg, in a concurring opinion, called &#8220;the freedom of speech and of the press&#8221; the &#8220;Ark of the Covenant of Democracy&#8221;. In Express Newspapers v. Union of India (7 October 1985), the Court stated that &#8220;Freedom of the press is comprehended within the right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Art.19(1)(a).&#8221; The newsprint case, Indian Express Newspapers v. Union of India, (1985) 1 SCC 641, is cited in Anuradha Bhasin for the point that &#8220;the freedom of print medium is covered under the freedom of speech and expression.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The clause covers the right to receive and spread information as well as to speak. In the Cricket Association of Bengal case, (1995) 2 SCC 161, the Court held that &#8220;the right to freedom of speech and expression includes the right to disseminate information&#8221;, while recognising that because &#8220;the airwaves\/frequencies are a public property and are also limited&#8221;, the right to use them needs regulation. The voter&#8217;s right to know is another example. In Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002), a bench of three judges held that &#8220;democracy cannot survive without free and fair election, without free and fairly informed voters&#8221;. The Supreme Court&#8217;s official summary of Poonam v. Dule Singh (6 November 2025) describes a voter&#8217;s right to know the antecedents of a candidate as &#8220;embedded in the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.&#8221; Applying the same principle, a Constitution Bench in the electoral bonds case, Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (15 February 2024), held that &#8220;information about funding to a political party is essential for a voter to exercise their freedom to vote in an effective manner&#8221;, and declared the Electoral Bond Scheme and the related amendments &#8220;violative of Article 19(1)(a) and unconstitutional&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The internet is treated the same way. In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (10 January 2020), the Court held that &#8220;the freedom of speech and expression through the medium of internet is an integral part of Article 19(1)(a) and accordingly, any restriction on the same must be in accordance with Article 19(2) of the Constitution.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Reasonable restrictions on speech under Article 19(2)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The law was restated in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (24 March 2015), in which Justice R.F. Nariman&#8217;s judgment struck down section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The Court identified three concepts: &#8220;Mere discussion or even advocacy of a particular cause howsoever unpopular is at the heart of Article 19(1)(a). It is only when such discussion or advocacy reaches the level of incitement that Article 19(2) kicks in.&#8221; A law restricting speech &#8220;has to be covered by one of the eight subject matters set out under Article 19(2)&#8221;, and it &#8220;can only pass muster if it is proximately related&#8221; to one of them. Because the general public interest is not among those subjects, &#8220;it is not open to the State to curtail freedom of speech to promote the general public interest&#8221;. Section 66A, with its vague and open-ended words, &#8220;must, therefore, fall foul of Article 19(1)(a), and not being saved under Article 19(2), is declared as unconstitutional.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shreya Singhal also relied on S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram, (1989) 2 SCC 574, decided by a bench of three judges, which said: &#8220;The anticipated danger should not be remote, conjectural or far-fetched. It should have proximate and direct nexus with the expression.&#8221; The expression, it added, &#8220;should be inseparably locked up with the action contemplated like the equivalent of a &#8216;spark in a powder keg'&#8221;. Rangarajan also held, as quoted in Indibily Creative v. Government of West Bengal (11 April 2019), that &#8220;freedom of expression cannot be suppressed on account of threat of demonstration and processions or threats of violence&#8221;, and that &#8220;The State cannot plead its inability to handle the hostile audience problem.&#8221; On the other side of the line, Anuradha Bhasin noted that &#8220;any speech which incites imminent violence does not enjoy constitutional protection.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether the State may add grounds of its own was settled by a Constitution Bench in Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh (3 January 2023), in Justice V. Ramasubramanian&#8217;s judgment: &#8220;The grounds lined up in Article 19(2) for restricting the right to free speech are exhaustive&#8221;, and &#8220;additional restrictions not found in Article 19(2), cannot be imposed on the exercise of the right&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reasonableness is judged case by case. The official report of State of Madras v. V.G. Row (31 March 1952) records the test of reasonableness: &#8220;The nature of the right alleged to have been infringed, the underlying purpose of the restrictions imposed, the extent and urgency of the evil sought to be remedied thereby, the disproportion of the imposition, the prevailing conditions at the time should all enter into the judicial verdict.&#8221; Modern cases add the language of proportionality. In Anuradha Bhasin, the Court held that &#8220;only the least restrictive measure can be resorted to by the State&#8221;, and, answering the argument that services could not be blocked selectively, said: &#8220;Such complete blocking\/prohibition perpetually cannot be accepted by this Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A 2025 judgment concerns the police. In Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (28 March 2025, Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan), the Court quashed an FIR registered against the appellant. It said that the police &#8220;officer must consider the meaning of the spoken or written words&#8221;, that &#8220;The reasonable restrictions provided for in Article 19(2) must remain reasonable and not fanciful and oppressive&#8221;, and that &#8220;it is our duty to uphold the fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(a).&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19(1)(b): to assemble peaceably and without arms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The right to assemble is qualified in its own words: the assembly must be peaceable and without arms. Under clause (3), the State may impose reasonable restrictions on it only in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order. Morality, decency and the general public interest are not grounds for restricting assemblies under this clause. Laws regulating processions and public meetings, and orders made under such laws restricting gatherings, are tested against clause (3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19(1)(c): associations, unions and co-operative societies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sub-clause (c) protects the right to form associations or unions, and since the Ninety-seventh Amendment, co-operative societies. Clause (4) permits reasonable restrictions in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, public order or morality. The leading early case is State of Madras v. V.G. Row (1952), decided by five judges. Section 15(2)(b) of the Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, as amended in Madras in 1950, allowed the State to declare an association unlawful by notification in the Official Gazette; the test was the Government&#8217;s subjective satisfaction, and there was no provision for adequate communication of the notification to the association and its members. The Court held that the provision &#8220;imposed restrictions on the fundamental right to form associations guaranteed by art. 19 (1) (c), which were not reasonable within the meaning of art. 19 (4) and was therefore unconstitutional and void.&#8221; The case is remembered as much for the reasonableness test quoted above as for its result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19(1)(d) and (e): movement and residence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sub-clauses (d) and (e) give every citizen the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and to reside and settle in any part of it. Both are subject to clause (5), which allows reasonable restrictions in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe. The second ground allows reasonable restrictions on movement and residence to be imposed for the protection of Scheduled Tribes. Until 1979 clause (5) also governed the right to property in sub-clause (f).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19(1)(g): profession, occupation, trade or business<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sub-clause (g) protects the right to practise any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. Clause (6) allows reasonable restrictions &#8220;in the interests of the general public&#8221;, and expressly saves laws on professional or technical qualifications, such as the conditions for enrolment as an advocate under the Advocates Act, 1961, and laws under which the State or a State corporation carries on a trade or business, even to the complete exclusion of citizens. As the Supreme Court explained in Sakal Papers, the general-public-interest ground available for trade is not available for speech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The right extends to small and informal trades. In Sodan Singh v. NDMC, (1989) 4 SCC 155, as described in Gainda Ram v. MCD (8 October 2010), a Constitution Bench recognised that hawkers and squatters &#8220;have a fundamental right to carry on business on the public street&#8221;, but that &#8220;the said right is subject to reasonable restrictions under Clause (6) of Article 19&#8221;. It also extends to new media of commerce: Anuradha Bhasin held that &#8220;the freedom of trade and commerce through the medium of the internet is also constitutionally protected under Article 19(1)(g), subject to the restrictions provided under Article 19(6).&#8221; Article 19(1)(g) protects the individual&#8217;s right to trade; the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India as a whole is dealt with separately in Articles 301 to 307.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happened to Article 19(1)(f)?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Many readers come to this page looking for Article 19(1)(f). Until 1979 it guaranteed to citizens the right &#8220;to acquire, hold and dispose of property&#8221;, subject to reasonable restrictions under clause (5). In R.C. Cooper (1970), the Supreme Court described it as &#8220;a positive declaration in the widest terms of the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property, subject to restrictions (which may assume the form of limitations or complete prohibition) imposed by law in the interests of the general public.&#8221; Alongside it, Article 31 dealt with compulsory acquisition of property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 removed both. Section 2 of that Act omitted sub-clause (f), and section 6 omitted Article 31, both with effect from 20 June 1979. Section 34 inserted a new Chapter IV, &#8220;Right to Property&#8221;, in Part XII, consisting of Article 300A: &#8220;No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.&#8221; The right to property thus moved out of Part III. It is still a constitutional right, and deprivation of property without the authority of law can be challenged, but it is no longer a fundamental right under Article 19. One practical consequence follows from the text of Article 32, which guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court &#8220;for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part&#8221;, that is, Part III. Article 226, by contrast, empowers High Courts to issue writs &#8220;for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose&#8221;, so a High Court writ petition remains available for a complaint under Article 300A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Article 19 during an Emergency<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 358(1) provides that while a Proclamation of Emergency &#8220;declaring that the security of India or any part of the territory thereof is threatened by war or by external aggression&#8221; is in operation, &#8220;nothing in article 19 shall restrict the power of the State&#8221; to make laws or take executive action, and any such law ceases to have effect, to the extent of the incompetency, when the Proclamation ends. The words limiting this to war or external aggression were substituted by the Forty-fourth Amendment with effect from 20 June 1979, so a Proclamation based on armed rebellion does not by itself suspend Article 19. The same Amendment added clause (2), under which the suspension applies only to laws that contain a recital that they are in relation to the Proclamation, and to executive action taken under such laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 359 works differently. It allows the President, while a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, to declare by order that the right to move any court for the enforcement of rights conferred by Part III mentioned in the order shall remain suspended. Since the Forty-fourth Amendment, the article expressly excludes &#8220;articles 20 and 21&#8221;, so the enforcement of the right to life and personal liberty, and the protections in respect of conviction for offences, cannot be suspended under it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Remedies when Article 19 is violated<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A citizen whose Article 19 rights are infringed by a law or by State action can move the Supreme Court under Article 32, which guarantees the right to approach that Court &#8220;by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part&#8221; and empowers it to issue &#8220;writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari&#8221;. The High Court can be approached under Article 226. Article 32(4) adds that the right guaranteed by that article &#8220;shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution&#8221;. If the infringement comes from a criminal case, the High Court can be asked to quash it under its inherent power, now saved by Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (formerly Section 482 CrPC), &#8220;to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice&#8221;. Imran Pratapgadhi reached the Supreme Court as a criminal appeal, and the FIR was quashed there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19 \u2013 \u0939\u093f\u0902\u0926\u0940 \u092e\u0947\u0902<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u092d\u093e\u0930\u0924\u0940\u092f \u0938\u0902\u0935\u093f\u0927\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19 \u0938\u092d\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094b\u0902 (citizens) \u0915\u094b \u091b\u0939 \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0902\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e\u090f\u0901 \u0926\u0947\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948: (\u0915) \u0935\u093e\u0915\u094d \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0902\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e, (\u0916) \u0936\u093e\u0902\u0924\u093f\u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0915 \u0914\u0930 \u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0939\u0925\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0947 \u0938\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0947\u0932\u0928 (assembly) \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930, (\u0917) \u0938\u0902\u0917\u092e, \u0938\u0902\u0918 \u092f\u093e \u0938\u0939\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u093f\u0924\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901 \u092c\u0928\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930, (\u0918) \u092d\u093e\u0930\u0924 \u0915\u0947 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0905\u092c\u093e\u0927 \u0938\u0902\u091a\u0930\u0923 (move freely) \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930, (\u0919) \u092d\u093e\u0930\u0924 \u0915\u0947 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u092d\u0940 \u092d\u093e\u0917 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0928\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0938 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0914\u0930 \u092c\u0938 \u091c\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930, \u0914\u0930 (\u091b) \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u092d\u0940 \u0935\u0943\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f, \u0909\u092a\u091c\u0940\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e, \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e \u0915\u093e\u0930\u092c\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0964 \u092f\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u094b \u0939\u0948\u0902; \u0915\u0902\u092a\u0928\u0940 \u092f\u093e \u0928\u093f\u0917\u092e \u0938\u094d\u0935\u092f\u0902 \u0907\u0928\u0915\u093e \u0926\u093e\u0935\u093e \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u0930 \u0938\u0915\u0924\u0947 (\u0906\u0930.\u0938\u0940. \u0915\u0942\u092a\u0930, 1970)\u0964<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u092f\u0947 \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0902\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e\u090f\u0901 \u0905\u0938\u0940\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0939\u0948\u0902\u0964 \u0916\u0902\u0921 (2) \u0938\u0947 (6) \u0924\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0915\u094b \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0942\u0928 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 &#8220;\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092c\u0902\u0927\u0928&#8221; (reasonable restrictions) \u0932\u0917\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0940 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u092e\u0924\u093f \u0939\u0948, \u0914\u0930 \u0935\u0939 \u092d\u0940 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0909\u0928\u094d\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u092a\u0930 \u091c\u094b \u0909\u0938 \u0916\u0902\u0921 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0932\u093f\u0916\u0947 \u0939\u0948\u0902\u0964 \u0935\u093e\u0915\u094d-\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0902\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0916\u0902\u0921 (2) \u0915\u0947 \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u0948\u0902: \u092d\u093e\u0930\u0924 \u0915\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u0941\u0924\u093e \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u0916\u0902\u0921\u0924\u093e, \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u0941\u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u093e, \u0935\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u094d\u092f\u094b\u0902 \u0938\u0947 \u092e\u0948\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940\u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u0938\u0902\u092c\u0902\u0927, \u0932\u094b\u0915 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0935\u0938\u094d\u0925\u093e, \u0936\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e \u0938\u0926\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930, \u0928\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f\u093e\u0932\u092f \u0915\u0940 \u0905\u0935\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u093e, \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0939\u093e\u0928\u093f \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u092a\u0930\u093e\u0927 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0909\u0915\u0938\u093e\u0928\u093e\u0964 \u0915\u094c\u0936\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 (2023) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0938\u0941\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0940\u092e \u0915\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091f \u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0939\u093e \u0915\u093f \u092f\u0947 \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u0942\u0930\u094d\u0923 (exhaustive) \u0939\u0948\u0902, \u0907\u0928\u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0932\u093e\u0935\u093e \u0915\u094b\u0908 \u0928\u092f\u093e \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092c\u0902\u0927\u0928 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u091c\u094b\u0921\u093c\u093e \u091c\u093e \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0964 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092f\u093e \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0918\u0932 (2015) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0906\u0908\u091f\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e \u0915\u0940 \u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e 66A \u0915\u094b \u0905\u0938\u0902\u0935\u0948\u0927\u093e\u0928\u093f\u0915 \u0918\u094b\u0937\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e, \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093e \u092d\u0938\u0940\u0928 (2020) \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0915\u0939\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e \u0915\u093f \u0907\u0902\u091f\u0930\u0928\u0947\u091f \u0915\u0947 \u092e\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u092e \u0938\u0947 \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092d\u0940 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19(1)(a) \u0915\u093e \u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0928 \u0905\u0902\u0917 \u0939\u0948\u0964<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19(1)(f) \u2013 \u0938\u0902\u092a\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947, \u0927\u093e\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0914\u0930 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u092f\u0928 (dispose of) \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u2013 \u0938\u0902\u0935\u093f\u0927\u093e\u0928 (\u091a\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0901 \u0938\u0902\u0936\u094b\u0927\u0928) \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928\u093f\u092f\u092e, 1978 \u0926\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0930\u093e 20 \u091c\u0942\u0928 1979 \u0938\u0947 \u0939\u091f\u093e \u0926\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0917\u092f\u093e\u0964 \u0905\u092c \u0938\u0902\u092a\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 300A \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u090f\u0915 \u0938\u0902\u0935\u0948\u0927\u093e\u0928\u093f\u0915 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u0948, \u091c\u093f\u0938\u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u094b \u0909\u0938\u0915\u0940 \u0938\u0902\u092a\u0924\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0938\u0947 \u0935\u093f\u0927\u093f \u0915\u0947 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0947 \u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0935\u0902\u091a\u093f\u0924 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u093e\u0964 \u092f\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927 \u092f\u093e \u092c\u093e\u0939\u0930\u0940 \u0906\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e\u0923 \u0915\u0947 \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u0930 \u0906\u092a\u093e\u0924\u0915\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0940 \u0918\u094b\u0937\u0923\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0917\u0942 \u0930\u0939\u0928\u0947 \u092a\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 358 \u0915\u0947 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19 \u0909\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0942\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0914\u0930 \u0909\u0928\u0915\u0947 \u0905\u0927\u0940\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093e\u0908 \u0915\u094b \u0938\u0940\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u0930\u0924\u093e \u091c\u093f\u0928\u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0906\u092a\u093e\u0924\u0915\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0947 \u0938\u0902\u092c\u0902\u0927\u093f\u0924 \u0939\u094b\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u093e \u0909\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0947\u0916 \u0939\u094b; \u092a\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 359 \u0915\u0947 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u092d\u0940 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 20 \u0914\u0930 21 \u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0928 \u0928\u093f\u0932\u0902\u092c\u093f\u0924 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0915\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0964 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 19 \u0915\u0947 \u0909\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0902\u0918\u0928 \u092a\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 32 (\u0938\u0941\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0940\u092e \u0915\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091f) \u092f\u093e \u0905\u0928\u0941\u091a\u094d\u091b\u0947\u0926 226 (\u0939\u093e\u0908 \u0915\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091f) \u0915\u0947 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u0930\u093f\u091f \u092f\u093e\u091a\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0926\u093e\u092f\u0930 \u0915\u0940 \u091c\u093e \u0938\u0915\u0924\u0940 \u0939\u0948\u0964<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"schema-faq wp-block-yoast-faq-block\"><div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What is Article 19 of the Indian Constitution?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Article 19 guarantees to all citizens six freedoms: speech and expression; assembling peaceably and without arms; forming associations, unions or co-operative societies; moving freely throughout India; residing and settling anywhere in India; and practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business. Clauses (2) to (6) allow reasonable restrictions by law on specified grounds.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-2\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What was Article 19(1)(f)?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Article 19(1)(f) guaranteed citizens the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property. It was omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 with effect from 20 June 1979. The right to property is now in Article 300A, which says no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-3\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Is the right to property still a fundamental right?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">No. Since 20 June 1979 it is a constitutional right under Article 300A, outside Part III. A person can still challenge deprivation of property that is not authorised by law, including by a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226, which covers rights under Part III &#8220;and for any other purpose&#8221;.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-4\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What are the grounds of reasonable restriction on free speech?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Under Article 19(2): the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation and incitement to an offence. In Kaushal Kishor (2023) the Supreme Court held that these grounds are exhaustive.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-5\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Is freedom of the press part of Article 19?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Yes. It is not mentioned separately, but the Supreme Court has held that freedom of the press is part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), for example in Express Newspapers v. Union of India (1985).<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-6\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Is the right to use the internet protected by Article 19?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">In Anuradha Bhasin (2020) the Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and expression through the internet is an integral part of Article 19(1)(a), and that trade and commerce through the internet is protected under Article 19(1)(g). Restrictions must meet clauses (2) and (6) and must be the least restrictive measure available.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-7\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Why was Section 66A of the IT Act struck down?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">In Shreya Singhal (2015) the Supreme Court held that the expressions used in Section 66A were open-ended, vague and undefined, and that the section violated Article 19(1)(a) and was not saved under Article 19(2). The Court distinguished discussion and advocacy, which are protected, from incitement, which can be restricted.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-8\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Can a company claim rights under Article 19?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Article 19 rights belong to citizens, and a corporation is not a citizen. But in R.C. Cooper (1970) the Supreme Court held that where State action impairs the rights of the company, the court can protect the rights of individual shareholders who are affected.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-9\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What is the test of a reasonable restriction?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">In V.G. Row (1952) the Supreme Court said that the nature of the right, the purpose of the restriction, the extent and urgency of the evil to be remedied, the disproportion of the imposition and the prevailing conditions must all be considered. Later cases, such as Anuradha Bhasin (2020), require the least restrictive measure.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-10\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Can the State restrict speech in the general public interest?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">No. Shreya Singhal (2015) held that it is not open to the State to curtail freedom of speech to promote the general public interest, because that is not a ground in Article 19(2). The general public interest is a ground only for restricting movement, residence and trade or business under clauses (5) and (6).<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-11\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Are hawkers protected by Article 19(1)(g)?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Yes, within limits. In Sodan Singh, (1989) 4 SCC 155, as described in Gainda Ram (2010), a Constitution Bench recognised that hawkers have a fundamental right to carry on business on the public street, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6).<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-12\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Can Article 19 be suspended during an emergency?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Under Article 358, while a Proclamation of Emergency on the ground of war or external aggression is in operation, Article 19 does not restrict the State&#8217;s power to make laws or take executive action, but only for laws containing a recital that they relate to the Emergency. Under Article 359, the President may suspend the enforcement of Part III rights named in an order, except Articles 20 and 21.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-13\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Does the voter&#8217;s right to know come under Article 19?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Yes. The Supreme Court&#8217;s summary of Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025), building on Association for Democratic Reforms (2002), describes a voter&#8217;s right to know the antecedents of candidates as embedded in Article 19(1)(a). In the electoral bonds case (2024) the Court held the Electoral Bond Scheme violative of Article 19(1)(a), because anonymising contributions infringed the voter&#8217;s right to information.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-14\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What can I do if my Article 19 rights are violated?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">You can file a writ petition in the Supreme Court under Article 32 or in the High Court under Article 226. If a criminal case has been registered over your speech, you can ask the High Court to quash it; in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025) the Supreme Court quashed such an FIR.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-15\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">What is the difference between Article 19 and Article 21?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Article 19 lists specific freedoms of citizens, each subject to one of the restriction clauses (2) to (6). Article 21 protects the life and personal liberty of every person, citizen or not, and allows deprivation only according to procedure established by law. The enforcement of Article 21, unlike that of Article 19, cannot be suspended under Article 359.<\/p> <\/div> <\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 19 is built on a simple design: a list of freedoms in clause (1) and, in clauses (2) to (6), the only grounds on which the State may restrict each of them. The Supreme Court has kept that design tight. Speech can be restricted only on the eight grounds in clause (2), only by law, and only where the link with the harm is close, as Shreya Singhal and Kaushal Kishor make clear; trade can be regulated more widely in the general public interest. The right to property has left Article 19 altogether and now lives in Article 300A. Read with the cases summarised here, the text of the article answers most questions about what citizens may do and how far the State may go.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sources used for this post: the Constitution of India, Articles 14, 19, 21, 31, 32, 226, 300A, 358 and 359 with their amendment footnotes (Legislative Department diglot edition, as on 10 September 2026); the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528 (the firm&#8217;s section-by-section data checked against the Gazette text); and the Supreme Court of India&#8217;s own copies or official reports of Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950, SCR headnote), State of Madras v. V.G. Row (31 March 1952), Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India (10 February 1970), Express Newspapers v. Union of India (7 October 1985), Gainda Ram v. MCD (8 October 2010, describing Sodan Singh), Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (24 March 2015, which also quotes Sakal Papers, Bennett Coleman, Cricket Association of Bengal and S. Rangarajan), Indibily Creative v. Government of West Bengal (11 April 2019), Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (10 January 2020), Kaushal Kishor v. State of U.P. (3 January 2023), Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (15 February 2024), Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (28 March 2025) and Poonam v. Dule Singh (6 November 2025, with the Court&#8217;s Landmark Judgment Summary).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"clf-related\" style=\"margin:28px 0 8px;padding:16px 20px;border:1px solid #e3e3e3;border-radius:6px;background:#fafafa\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 8px;font-weight:700\">Related reading<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:20px\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/fundamental-rights-and-duties-in-indian-constitution\/\">Fundamental Rights and Duties in the Indian Constitution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-14-of-theindian-constitution\/\">Article 14 of the Indian Constitution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-21-of-the-indian-constitution\/\">Article 21 of the Indian Constitution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/freedom-of-trade-commerce-and-intercourse-under-the-indian-constitution-1950\/\">Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse (Articles 301 to 307)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/emergency-provisions-in-the-indian-constitution-an-exhaustive-analysis\/\">Emergency Provisions in the Indian Constitution<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/right-to-privacy-in-india-exploring-article-21-and-the-landmark-puttaswamy-judgment\/\">Right to Privacy in India<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/sedition-law-in-india-scrapped\/\">Sedition Law in India<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/the-unbalanced-alliance-of-ip-laws-and-free-speech-finding-the-balance-between-protection-and-expression\/\">IP Laws and Free Speech<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees to every citizen six freedoms: speech and expression, peaceful assembly, association, movement, residence, and the freedom to practise a profession or carry on a trade or business. None of them is absolute. Each is subject to one of clauses (2) to (6), which allow the State to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2475,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1662],"tags":[279,1657],"class_list":["post-2476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-indian-constitution-1950","tag-advocate-delhi","tag-article-19"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Century Law Firm Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Century-Law-Firm-103762818279916\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@centurylawind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@centurylawind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/15c0285d46c9a3250f689fe9da251747\"},\"headline\":\"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: The Six Freedoms, Reasonable Restrictions, What Happened to Article 19(1)(f), and Landmark Cases\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4753,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/ARTICLE-19.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Advocate Delhi\",\"article 19\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Indian Constitution (1950)\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"FAQPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/\",\"name\":\"Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/ARTICLE-19.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"mainEntity\":[{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-1\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-2\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-3\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-4\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-5\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-6\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-7\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-8\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-9\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-10\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-11\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-12\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-13\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-14\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-15\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/ARTICLE-19.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/ARTICLE-19.png\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: A Comprehensive Analysis\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: The Six Freedoms, Reasonable Restrictions, What Happened to Article 19(1)(f), and Landmark Cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Century Law Firm Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Century Law Firm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/Century-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/05\\\/Century-1.png\",\"width\":1801,\"height\":538,\"caption\":\"Century Law Firm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Century-Law-Firm-103762818279916\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/centurylawind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/centurylawind\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCC1y40wQB720qJ-eGQLJR3w\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/15c0285d46c9a3250f689fe9da251747\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\"]},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-1\",\"position\":1,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-1\",\"name\":\"What is Article 19 of the Indian Constitution?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Article 19 guarantees to all citizens six freedoms: speech and expression; assembling peaceably and without arms; forming associations, unions or co-operative societies; moving freely throughout India; residing and settling anywhere in India; and practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business. Clauses (2) to (6) allow reasonable restrictions by law on specified grounds.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-2\",\"position\":2,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-2\",\"name\":\"What was Article 19(1)(f)?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Article 19(1)(f) guaranteed citizens the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property. It was omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 with effect from 20 June 1979. The right to property is now in Article 300A, which says no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-3\",\"position\":3,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-3\",\"name\":\"Is the right to property still a fundamental right?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. Since 20 June 1979 it is a constitutional right under Article 300A, outside Part III. A person can still challenge deprivation of property that is not authorised by law, including by a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226, which covers rights under Part III \\\"and for any other purpose\\\".\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-4\",\"position\":4,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-4\",\"name\":\"What are the grounds of reasonable restriction on free speech?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Under Article 19(2): the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation and incitement to an offence. In Kaushal Kishor (2023) the Supreme Court held that these grounds are exhaustive.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-5\",\"position\":5,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-5\",\"name\":\"Is freedom of the press part of Article 19?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. It is not mentioned separately, but the Supreme Court has held that freedom of the press is part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), for example in Express Newspapers v. Union of India (1985).\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-6\",\"position\":6,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-6\",\"name\":\"Is the right to use the internet protected by Article 19?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"In Anuradha Bhasin (2020) the Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and expression through the internet is an integral part of Article 19(1)(a), and that trade and commerce through the internet is protected under Article 19(1)(g). Restrictions must meet clauses (2) and (6) and must be the least restrictive measure available.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-7\",\"position\":7,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-7\",\"name\":\"Why was Section 66A of the IT Act struck down?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"In Shreya Singhal (2015) the Supreme Court held that the expressions used in Section 66A were open-ended, vague and undefined, and that the section violated Article 19(1)(a) and was not saved under Article 19(2). The Court distinguished discussion and advocacy, which are protected, from incitement, which can be restricted.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-8\",\"position\":8,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-8\",\"name\":\"Can a company claim rights under Article 19?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Article 19 rights belong to citizens, and a corporation is not a citizen. But in R.C. Cooper (1970) the Supreme Court held that where State action impairs the rights of the company, the court can protect the rights of individual shareholders who are affected.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-9\",\"position\":9,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-9\",\"name\":\"What is the test of a reasonable restriction?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"In V.G. Row (1952) the Supreme Court said that the nature of the right, the purpose of the restriction, the extent and urgency of the evil to be remedied, the disproportion of the imposition and the prevailing conditions must all be considered. Later cases, such as Anuradha Bhasin (2020), require the least restrictive measure.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-10\",\"position\":10,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-10\",\"name\":\"Can the State restrict speech in the general public interest?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. Shreya Singhal (2015) held that it is not open to the State to curtail freedom of speech to promote the general public interest, because that is not a ground in Article 19(2). The general public interest is a ground only for restricting movement, residence and trade or business under clauses (5) and (6).\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-11\",\"position\":11,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-11\",\"name\":\"Are hawkers protected by Article 19(1)(g)?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes, within limits. In Sodan Singh, (1989) 4 SCC 155, as described in Gainda Ram (2010), a Constitution Bench recognised that hawkers have a fundamental right to carry on business on the public street, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6).\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-12\",\"position\":12,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-12\",\"name\":\"Can Article 19 be suspended during an emergency?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Under Article 358, while a Proclamation of Emergency on the ground of war or external aggression is in operation, Article 19 does not restrict the State's power to make laws or take executive action, but only for laws containing a recital that they relate to the Emergency. Under Article 359, the President may suspend the enforcement of Part III rights named in an order, except Articles 20 and 21.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-13\",\"position\":13,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-13\",\"name\":\"Does the voter's right to know come under Article 19?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. The Supreme Court's summary of Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025), building on Association for Democratic Reforms (2002), describes a voter's right to know the antecedents of candidates as embedded in Article 19(1)(a). In the electoral bonds case (2024) the Court held the Electoral Bond Scheme violative of Article 19(1)(a), because anonymising contributions infringed the voter's right to information.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-14\",\"position\":14,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-14\",\"name\":\"What can I do if my Article 19 rights are violated?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"You can file a writ petition in the Supreme Court under Article 32 or in the High Court under Article 226. If a criminal case has been registered over your speech, you can ask the High Court to quash it; in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025) the Supreme Court quashed such an FIR.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-15\",\"position\":15,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.centurylawfirm.in\\\/blog\\\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\\\/#faq-question-15\",\"name\":\"What is the difference between Article 19 and Article 21?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Article 19 lists specific freedoms of citizens, each subject to one of the restriction clauses (2) to (6). Article 21 protects the life and personal liberty of every person, citizen or not, and allows deprivation only according to procedure established by law. The enforcement of Article 21, unlike that of Article 19, cannot be suspended under Article 359.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases","description":"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases","og_description":"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/","og_site_name":"Century Law Firm Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Century-Law-Firm-103762818279916","article_published_time":"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1080,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@centurylawind","twitter_site":"@centurylawind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/15c0285d46c9a3250f689fe9da251747"},"headline":"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: The Six Freedoms, Reasonable Restrictions, What Happened to Article 19(1)(f), and Landmark Cases","datePublished":"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/"},"wordCount":4753,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png","keywords":["Advocate Delhi","article 19"],"articleSection":["Indian Constitution (1950)"],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":["WebPage","FAQPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/","name":"Article 19 of Indian Constitution: Freedoms, 19(1)(f), Cases","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png","datePublished":"2023-08-07T08:38:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-20T00:37:18+00:00","description":"Article 19 explained: text, the six freedoms, restrictions in clauses (2) to (6), why 19(1)(f) was deleted, Article 300A, and landmark Supreme Court cases.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#breadcrumb"},"mainEntity":[{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-1"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-2"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-3"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-4"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-5"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-6"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-7"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-8"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-9"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-10"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-11"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-12"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-13"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-14"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-15"}],"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: A Comprehensive Analysis"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Article 19 of the Indian Constitution: The Six Freedoms, Reasonable Restrictions, What Happened to Article 19(1)(f), and Landmark Cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/","name":"Century Law Firm Blog","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#organization","name":"Century Law Firm","url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Century-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Century-1.png","width":1801,"height":538,"caption":"Century Law Firm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Century-Law-Firm-103762818279916","https:\/\/x.com\/centurylawind","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/centurylawind\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCC1y40wQB720qJ-eGQLJR3w"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/15c0285d46c9a3250f689fe9da251747","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9067e9a8d23d7f8eaaa89c9f746f4e14d55fa71a602bcc4b141c8acf46a3291?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog"]},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-1","position":1,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-1","name":"What is Article 19 of the Indian Constitution?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Article 19 guarantees to all citizens six freedoms: speech and expression; assembling peaceably and without arms; forming associations, unions or co-operative societies; moving freely throughout India; residing and settling anywhere in India; and practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business. Clauses (2) to (6) allow reasonable restrictions by law on specified grounds.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-2","position":2,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-2","name":"What was Article 19(1)(f)?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Article 19(1)(f) guaranteed citizens the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property. It was omitted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 with effect from 20 June 1979. The right to property is now in Article 300A, which says no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-3","position":3,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-3","name":"Is the right to property still a fundamental right?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. Since 20 June 1979 it is a constitutional right under Article 300A, outside Part III. A person can still challenge deprivation of property that is not authorised by law, including by a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226, which covers rights under Part III \"and for any other purpose\".","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-4","position":4,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-4","name":"What are the grounds of reasonable restriction on free speech?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Under Article 19(2): the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation and incitement to an offence. In Kaushal Kishor (2023) the Supreme Court held that these grounds are exhaustive.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-5","position":5,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-5","name":"Is freedom of the press part of Article 19?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes. It is not mentioned separately, but the Supreme Court has held that freedom of the press is part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), for example in Express Newspapers v. Union of India (1985).","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-6","position":6,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-6","name":"Is the right to use the internet protected by Article 19?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In Anuradha Bhasin (2020) the Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and expression through the internet is an integral part of Article 19(1)(a), and that trade and commerce through the internet is protected under Article 19(1)(g). Restrictions must meet clauses (2) and (6) and must be the least restrictive measure available.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-7","position":7,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-7","name":"Why was Section 66A of the IT Act struck down?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In Shreya Singhal (2015) the Supreme Court held that the expressions used in Section 66A were open-ended, vague and undefined, and that the section violated Article 19(1)(a) and was not saved under Article 19(2). The Court distinguished discussion and advocacy, which are protected, from incitement, which can be restricted.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-8","position":8,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-8","name":"Can a company claim rights under Article 19?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Article 19 rights belong to citizens, and a corporation is not a citizen. But in R.C. Cooper (1970) the Supreme Court held that where State action impairs the rights of the company, the court can protect the rights of individual shareholders who are affected.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-9","position":9,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-9","name":"What is the test of a reasonable restriction?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In V.G. Row (1952) the Supreme Court said that the nature of the right, the purpose of the restriction, the extent and urgency of the evil to be remedied, the disproportion of the imposition and the prevailing conditions must all be considered. Later cases, such as Anuradha Bhasin (2020), require the least restrictive measure.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-10","position":10,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-10","name":"Can the State restrict speech in the general public interest?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. Shreya Singhal (2015) held that it is not open to the State to curtail freedom of speech to promote the general public interest, because that is not a ground in Article 19(2). The general public interest is a ground only for restricting movement, residence and trade or business under clauses (5) and (6).","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-11","position":11,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-11","name":"Are hawkers protected by Article 19(1)(g)?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, within limits. In Sodan Singh, (1989) 4 SCC 155, as described in Gainda Ram (2010), a Constitution Bench recognised that hawkers have a fundamental right to carry on business on the public street, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6).","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-12","position":12,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-12","name":"Can Article 19 be suspended during an emergency?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Under Article 358, while a Proclamation of Emergency on the ground of war or external aggression is in operation, Article 19 does not restrict the State's power to make laws or take executive action, but only for laws containing a recital that they relate to the Emergency. Under Article 359, the President may suspend the enforcement of Part III rights named in an order, except Articles 20 and 21.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-13","position":13,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-13","name":"Does the voter's right to know come under Article 19?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes. The Supreme Court's summary of Poonam v. Dule Singh (2025), building on Association for Democratic Reforms (2002), describes a voter's right to know the antecedents of candidates as embedded in Article 19(1)(a). In the electoral bonds case (2024) the Court held the Electoral Bond Scheme violative of Article 19(1)(a), because anonymising contributions infringed the voter's right to information.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-14","position":14,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-14","name":"What can I do if my Article 19 rights are violated?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"You can file a writ petition in the Supreme Court under Article 32 or in the High Court under Article 226. If a criminal case has been registered over your speech, you can ask the High Court to quash it; in Imran Pratapgadhi v. State of Gujarat (2025) the Supreme Court quashed such an FIR.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-15","position":15,"url":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/article-19-of-the-indian-constitution-a-comprehensive-analysis\/#faq-question-15","name":"What is the difference between Article 19 and Article 21?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Article 19 lists specific freedoms of citizens, each subject to one of the restriction clauses (2) to (6). Article 21 protects the life and personal liberty of every person, citizen or not, and allows deprivation only according to procedure established by law. The enforcement of Article 21, unlike that of Article 19, cannot be suspended under Article 359.","inLanguage":"en"},"inLanguage":"en"}]}},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png",1080,1080,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19-300x300.png",300,300,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19-768x768.png",768,768,true],"large":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19-1024x1024.png",1024,1024,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png",1080,1080,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ARTICLE-19.png",1080,1080,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/author\/admin\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees to every citizen six freedoms: speech and expression, peaceful assembly, association, movement, residence, and the freedom to practise a profession or carry on a trade or business. None of them is absolute. Each is subject to one of clauses (2) to (6), which allow the State to&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2476"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5578,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2476\/revisions\/5578"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centurylawfirm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}