Post By: Jay
If you’re reading this because your family is going through a hard patch, first, breathe. I won’t give you platitudes. I will give you what I’d tell a client sitting across my desk: a clear view of how the law works, how real families have used it to protect children and rebuild lives, and what a good family lawyer in Brisbane actually does day-to-day. Along the way, I’ll draw on legal principles, empirical studies, and statistics so you can see the landscape clearly, not just the scary headlines.
The Legal Compass in Child Custody: “Best Interests of the Child”
In Australian family law, the guiding principle in any Child Custody matter is the best interests of the child. This isn’t just a slogan, it’s written into legislation. Under Section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975, courts are required to assess specific primary and additional factors when making parenting orders.
That means Child Custody decisions aren’t based on convenience, personal preference, or who argues the loudest. Instead, judges must weigh clearly defined elements designed to safeguard a child’s well-being and relationships.
In practice, the court balances the benefit of maintaining meaningful relationships with both parents against the need to protect the child from harm. These broad considerations are broken into practical questions, such as who provides daily care, the child’s school and community connections, any history of family violence, and the child’s own views (depending on age and maturity).
A skilled family lawyer presenting a Child Custody case knows how to align your story with these statutory factors, ensuring the court sees what truly supports the child’s welfare and long-term stability.
Why lawyers matter: more than “arguing in court”
A common misconception is that family lawyers exist to “win” fights. That’s part of it, but a more important part of our job is risk-management and pathway-building.
When I act for a parent in Brisbane, I do at least four things:
- Translate emotions into legal evidence – Courts make decisions based on evidence. A lawyer helps gather documents, timelines, police or medical records, school reports, and credible witness statements so the decision-maker sees the full picture.
- Design safe, practical arrangements – If there are safety concerns, family violence, substance misuse, or a criminal charge like a drink-driving offence that affects parenting capacity, we propose stepwise arrangements (for example, supervised time, assessments, or conditions) that protect children while allowing rebuilding where safe and appropriate.
- Use non-court options where they help – Many disputes are resolved faster and with less damage through mediation, Family Dispute Resolution, or carefully negotiated Parenting Plans. Lawyers guide clients on when to litigate and when to mediate.
- Prepare for the long game – Family breakdowns are often messy and long. We plan for schooling continuity, counselling referrals, and post-order compliance mechanisms so that children’s lives face minimal disruption.
Put simply: lawyers help families arrive at outcomes that protect children and preserve relationships, not escalate wounds.
Real approaches: supervised contact and staged rebuilding
There’s a body of research about how courts manage contact where safety or other risks are raised. One Australian study examined the Family Law Court’s use of supervised contact orders in contested custody disputes and explored why such orders are made and how they operate. Supervised contact is not a punishment, it’s a safety mechanism and, crucially, a bridge back toward greater parental involvement when appropriate. The study highlights how supervised arrangements are used to balance protection and contact in real cases.
Let me translate that to a typical Brisbane scenario I’ve seen dozens of times:
- Parent A has been the primary carer. Parent B expresses remorse and wants meaningful contact, but there are genuine safety concerns (past domestic violence, alcohol-related incidents, or a relevant criminal charge).
- The lawyer for Parent B proposes supervised visits at a local Children’s Contact Service or similar facility, paired with engagement in a parenting program and, if necessary, alcohol treatment. Parent A’s lawyer asks for clear conditions and a review timeline.
- The court approves initial supervised access with a built-in review at 3–6 months, tied to evidence of compliance. If the parent demonstrates safe behaviour, time gradually increases.
That staged approach protects the child immediately while giving a realistic pathway back to unsupervised time when it’s safe to do so. It’s the kind of pragmatic solution that frontline family lawyers draft and advocate for, and the research above shows these orders are a commonly used tool in Australia.
The numbers: separation, divorce, and the trends you should know
Quick, useful statistics to anchor expectations:
- Divorce and marriage trends have shifted in recent years. The number of divorces has declined from peaks in past decades; for example, recent official data shows divorce rates at lower levels than in the 1970s, and ongoing changes to marriage/divorce patterns. These trends influence caseloads and the makeup of family law matters.
- Children’s Contact Services and supervised arrangements exist because family law systems recognise that many separated families need support to manage handovers and visits safely. These services are part of a broader infrastructure that supports staged rebuilding.
Numbers don’t tell the whole story, every family’s circumstances are unique, but they help explain the systems we use: mediation, supervised contact, protective injunctions, and targeted parenting plans.
Two real-world (composite) stories, anonymised but true in structure
Below are sanitized, composite examples based on cases I’ve worked on and common paths families take. I’ve changed identifying details to protect privacy, but the legal logic is the same.
Story A, “Sam and Jess”: rebuilding after concern about safety
Sam and Jess had been together for eight years and had two school-aged kids. After a domestic incident, the children lived with Jess. Sam sought more time, but had a recent drink-driving charge and a previous episode of violence reported to the police.
What we did:
- Collected evidence (police file, counseling notes, school attendance).
- Sought temporary supervised time through a local Children’s Contact Service.
- Negotiated a court-approved parenting plan that required Sam to engage in an alcohol program and domestic-violence intervention program, with a review in 4 months.
Outcome:
- Supervised time allowed the children to spend safe, predictable periods with Sam.
- After Sam completed programs and showed sustained change, unsupervised time increased gradually.
- The children retained meaningful relationships with both parents, and Jess had the reassurance of staged safety measures.
Legal principles used:
- Emphasis on the child’s best interests and explicit, evidence-based safety measures under Part VII of the Family Law Act.
Story B, “Maria and Tom”: protecting schooling continuity while resolving parental dispute
Maria and Tom separated during the school year. Their primary concern wasn’t violence, it was that the children’s schooling, friendships, and daily routine were at risk because both parents lived in different suburbs and communication was poor.
What we did:
- Proposed a parenting timetable that prioritised the children’s school routine and reduced changes during term time.
- Drafted a Parenting Plan with clear handover arrangements and a communication protocol (shared calendar, designated email).
- Included mediation clauses and an agreement to attend a family counsellor if disputes resurfaced.
Outcome:
- Children continued at the same school with minimal disruption.
- Parents gradually rebuilt cooperative communication and avoided expensive litigation.
Legal principles used:
- Applying the best-interests analysis to prioritise stability and the child’s schooling commitments.
What law studies actually tell us, and how lawyers use that research
Law and social science research matters because it tests which legal responses actually protect children and rebuild families. For example:
- Studies on supervised contact clarify when supervised access supports safe rebuilding, rather than simply restricting contact. Courts and lawyers use that research to design evidence-based orders.
- Policy research on Children’s Contact Services explains their practical role: safe handovers, neutral sites for visits, and trained staff to de-escalate conflict, again, useful when a lawyer drafts a proposal for an interim arrangement.
So when a lawyer says “we’ll seek supervised contact,” that’s not guesswork, it’s applying empirical insights to a real family’s risks and capacities.
How a Brisbane family lawyer prepares you for the process
If you’re thinking “what next?” here’s a pragmatic checklist I use with clients:
- Document the facts – Keep a dated chronological file: incidents, witnesses, messages, school notes. Courts and mediators rely on clear timelines.
- Prioritise the child’s routine – Evidence that a proposed schedule supports school and health needs is persuasive.
- Engage professional help early – Counselling, parenting programs, or alcohol treatment can be powerful evidence of commitment to change.
- Consider non-court options first – Mediation and Parenting Plans are often faster, cheaper, and less traumatic for children.
- Be realistic and legally framed – We’ll translate your hopes and fears into legally cognisable positions, what the court will actually consider under section 60CC.
Rebuilding is possible with the right support
Families rebuild every day. The law provides tools, parenting orders, supervised contact, injunctions, and mediation frameworks, but those are instruments, not outcomes. The real work is human: evidence-based safety, steady routines, accountability, and, often, professional help.
As a Brisbane family lawyer, I’ll be blunt: the system can feel adversarial, and lawyers sometimes make it worse by stoking conflict. My approach is different: assess risks, propose practical staged solutions, use research and statutory principles, and always keep the child’s best interests centre stage. When that’s done, you get outcomes that protect children, restore meaningful relationships, and let families start the slow work of rebuilding.
Guest Post Disclaimer:
This article is a guest post and does not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Century Law Firm. The content and any links provided within the post are the sole responsibility of the author. Century Law Firm does not endorse, support, represent, or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any information, claims, or links contained within this guest post. We accept no responsibility or liability for the content, any errors or omissions, or any potential damages or consequences that may arise from reading or relying on it. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and come to their own conclusions before following any links or acting on the information presented.